JAVA TRÅDPOOL | TRÅDPOOLNING I JAVA

Java trådpool representerar en grupp arbetartrådar som väntar på jobbet och återanvänds många gånger.

I fallet med en trådpool skapas en grupp av trådar med fast storlek. En tråd från trådpoolen dras ut och tilldelas ett jobb av tjänsteleverantören. Efter slutförandet av jobbet finns tråden i trådpoolen igen.

java-ingång

Trådpoolmetoder

newFixedThreadPool(int s): Metoden skapar en trådpool av den fasta storleken s.

newCachedThreadPool(): Metoden skapar en ny trådpool som skapar de nya trådarna när det behövs men kommer fortfarande att använda den tidigare skapade tråden närhelst de är tillgängliga att använda.

newSingleThreadExecutor(): Metoden skapar en ny tråd.

Fördelen med Java Thread Pool

Bättre prestanda Det sparar tid eftersom det inte finns något behov av att skapa en ny tråd.

Realtidsanvändning

Den används i Servlet och JSP där behållaren skapar en trådpool för att bearbeta begäran.

Exempel på Java Thread Pool

Låt oss se ett enkelt exempel på Java-trådpoolen som använder ExecutorService och Executors.

Fil: WorkerThread.java

 import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService; import java.util.concurrent.Executors; class WorkerThread implements Runnable { private String message; public WorkerThread(String s){ this.message=s; } public void run() { System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName()+&apos; (Start) message = &apos;+message); processmessage();//call processmessage method that sleeps the thread for 2 seconds System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName()+&apos; (End)&apos;);//prints thread name } private void processmessage() { try { Thread.sleep(2000); } catch (InterruptedException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } }

Fil: TestThreadPool.java

 public class TestThreadPool { public static void main(String[] args) { ExecutorService executor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(5);//creating a pool of 5 threads for (int i = 0; i <10; i++) { runnable worker="new" workerthread('' + i); executor.execute(worker); calling execute method of executorservice } executor.shutdown(); while (!executor.isterminated()) system.out.println('finished all threads'); < pre> <p> <strong>Output:</strong> </p> <pre>pool-1-thread-1 (Start) message = 0 pool-1-thread-2 (Start) message = 1 pool-1-thread-3 (Start) message = 2 pool-1-thread-5 (Start) message = 4 pool-1-thread-4 (Start) message = 3 pool-1-thread-2 (End) pool-1-thread-2 (Start) message = 5 pool-1-thread-1 (End) pool-1-thread-1 (Start) message = 6 pool-1-thread-3 (End) pool-1-thread-3 (Start) message = 7 pool-1-thread-4 (End) pool-1-thread-4 (Start) message = 8 pool-1-thread-5 (End) pool-1-thread-5 (Start) message = 9 pool-1-thread-2 (End) pool-1-thread-1 (End) pool-1-thread-4 (End) pool-1-thread-3 (End) pool-1-thread-5 (End) Finished all threads </pre> download this example <h2>Thread Pool Example: 2</h2> <p>Let&apos;s see another example of the thread pool.</p> <p> <strong>FileName:</strong> ThreadPoolExample.java</p> <pre> // important import statements import java.util.Date; import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService; import java.util.concurrent.Executors; import java.text.SimpleDateFormat; class Tasks implements Runnable { private String taskName; // constructor of the class Tasks public Tasks(String str) { // initializing the field taskName taskName = str; } // Printing the task name and then sleeps for 1 sec // The complete process is getting repeated five times public void run() { try { for (int j = 0; j <= 5; j++) { if (j="=" 0) date dt="new" date(); simpledateformat sdf="new" simpledateformat('hh : mm ss'); prints the initialization time for every task system.out.println('initialization name: '+ taskname + '=" + sdf.format(dt)); } else { Date dt = new Date(); SimpleDateFormat sdf = new SimpleDateFormat(" hh execution system.out.println('time of is complete.'); } catch(interruptedexception ie) ie.printstacktrace(); public class threadpoolexample maximum number threads in thread pool static final int max_th="3;" main method void main(string argvs[]) creating five new tasks runnable rb1="new" tasks('task 1'); rb2="new" 2'); rb3="new" 3'); rb4="new" 4'); rb5="new" 5'); a with size fixed executorservice pl="Executors.newFixedThreadPool(MAX_TH);" passes objects to execute (step 3) pl.execute(rb1); pl.execute(rb2); pl.execute(rb3); pl.execute(rb4); pl.execute(rb5); shutdown pl.shutdown(); < pre> <p> <strong>Output:</strong> </p> <pre> Initialization time for the task name: task 1 = 06 : 13 : 02 Initialization time for the task name: task 2 = 06 : 13 : 02 Initialization time for the task name: task 3 = 06 : 13 : 02 Time of execution for the task name: task 1 = 06 : 13 : 04 Time of execution for the task name: task 2 = 06 : 13 : 04 Time of execution for the task name: task 3 = 06 : 13 : 04 Time of execution for the task name: task 1 = 06 : 13 : 05 Time of execution for the task name: task 2 = 06 : 13 : 05 Time of execution for the task name: task 3 = 06 : 13 : 05 Time of execution for the task name: task 1 = 06 : 13 : 06 Time of execution for the task name: task 2 = 06 : 13 : 06 Time of execution for the task name: task 3 = 06 : 13 : 06 Time of execution for the task name: task 1 = 06 : 13 : 07 Time of execution for the task name: task 2 = 06 : 13 : 07 Time of execution for the task name: task 3 = 06 : 13 : 07 Time of execution for the task name: task 1 = 06 : 13 : 08 Time of execution for the task name: task 2 = 06 : 13 : 08 Time of execution for the task name: task 3 = 06 : 13 : 08 task 2 is complete. Initialization time for the task name: task 4 = 06 : 13 : 09 task 1 is complete. Initialization time for the task name: task 5 = 06 : 13 : 09 task 3 is complete. Time of execution for the task name: task 4 = 06 : 13 : 10 Time of execution for the task name: task 5 = 06 : 13 : 10 Time of execution for the task name: task 4 = 06 : 13 : 11 Time of execution for the task name: task 5 = 06 : 13 : 11 Time of execution for the task name: task 4 = 06 : 13 : 12 Time of execution for the task name: task 5 = 06 : 13 : 12 Time of execution for the task name: task 4 = 06 : 13 : 13 Time of execution for the task name: task 5 = 06 : 13 : 13 Time of execution for the task name: task 4 = 06 : 13 : 14 Time of execution for the task name: task 5 = 06 : 13 : 14 task 4 is complete. task 5 is complete. </pre> <p> <strong>Explanation:</strong> It is evident by looking at the output of the program that tasks 4 and 5 are executed only when the thread has an idle thread. Until then, the extra tasks are put in the queue.</p> <p>The takeaway from the above example is when one wants to execute 50 tasks but is not willing to create 50 threads. In such a case, one can create a pool of 10 threads. Thus, 10 out of 50 tasks are assigned, and the rest are put in the queue. Whenever any thread out of 10 threads becomes idle, it picks up the 11<sup>th </sup>task. The other pending tasks are treated the same way.</p> <h2>Risks involved in Thread Pools</h2> <p>The following are the risk involved in the thread pools.</p> <p> <strong>Deadlock:</strong> It is a known fact that deadlock can come in any program that involves multithreading, and a thread pool introduces another scenario of deadlock. Consider a scenario where all the threads that are executing are waiting for the results from the threads that are blocked and waiting in the queue because of the non-availability of threads for the execution.</p> <p> <strong>Thread Leakage:</strong> Leakage of threads occurs when a thread is being removed from the pool to execute a task but is not returning to it after the completion of the task. For example, when a thread throws the exception and the pool class is not able to catch this exception, then the thread exits and reduces the thread pool size by 1. If the same thing repeats a number of times, then there are fair chances that the pool will become empty, and hence, there are no threads available in the pool for executing other requests.</p> <p> <strong>Resource Thrashing:</strong> A lot of time is wasted in context switching among threads when the size of the thread pool is very large. Whenever there are more threads than the optimal number may cause the starvation problem, and it leads to resource thrashing.</p> <h2>Points to Remember</h2> <p>Do not queue the tasks that are concurrently waiting for the results obtained from the other tasks. It may lead to a deadlock situation, as explained above.</p> <p>Care must be taken whenever threads are used for the operation that is long-lived. It may result in the waiting of thread forever and will finally lead to the leakage of the resource.</p> <p>In the end, the thread pool has to be ended explicitly. If it does not happen, then the program continues to execute, and it never ends. Invoke the shutdown() method on the thread pool to terminate the executor. Note that if someone tries to send another task to the executor after shutdown, it will throw a RejectedExecutionException.</p> <p>One needs to understand the tasks to effectively tune the thread pool. If the given tasks are contrasting, then one should look for pools for executing different varieties of tasks so that one can properly tune them.</p> <p>To reduce the probability of running JVM out of memory, one can control the maximum threads that can run in JVM. The thread pool cannot create new threads after it has reached the maximum limit.</p> <p>A thread pool can use the same used thread if the thread has finished its execution. Thus, the time and resources used for the creation of a new thread are saved.</p> <h2>Tuning the Thread Pool</h2> <p>The accurate size of a thread pool is decided by the number of available processors and the type of tasks the threads have to execute. If a system has the P processors that have only got the computation type processes, then the maximum size of the thread pool of P or P + 1 achieves the maximum efficiency. However, the tasks may have to wait for I/O, and in such a scenario, one has to take into consideration the ratio of the waiting time (W) and the service time (S) for the request; resulting in the maximum size of the pool P * (1 + W / S) for the maximum efficiency.</p> <h2>Conclusion</h2> <p>A thread pool is a very handy tool for organizing applications, especially on the server-side. Concept-wise, a thread pool is very easy to comprehend. However, one may have to look at a lot of issues when dealing with a thread pool. It is because the thread pool comes with some risks involved it (risks are discussed above).</p> <hr></=></pre></10;>

ladda ner det här exemplet

Exempel på trådpool: 2

Låt oss se ett annat exempel på trådpoolen.

Filnamn: ThreadPoolExample.java

 // important import statements import java.util.Date; import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService; import java.util.concurrent.Executors; import java.text.SimpleDateFormat; class Tasks implements Runnable { private String taskName; // constructor of the class Tasks public Tasks(String str) { // initializing the field taskName taskName = str; } // Printing the task name and then sleeps for 1 sec // The complete process is getting repeated five times public void run() { try { for (int j = 0; j <= 5; j++) { if (j="=" 0) date dt="new" date(); simpledateformat sdf="new" simpledateformat(\'hh : mm ss\'); prints the initialization time for every task system.out.println(\'initialization name: \'+ taskname + \'=" + sdf.format(dt)); } else { Date dt = new Date(); SimpleDateFormat sdf = new SimpleDateFormat(" hh execution system.out.println(\'time of is complete.\'); } catch(interruptedexception ie) ie.printstacktrace(); public class threadpoolexample maximum number threads in thread pool static final int max_th="3;" main method void main(string argvs[]) creating five new tasks runnable rb1="new" tasks(\'task 1\'); rb2="new" 2\'); rb3="new" 3\'); rb4="new" 4\'); rb5="new" 5\'); a with size fixed executorservice pl="Executors.newFixedThreadPool(MAX_TH);" passes objects to execute (step 3) pl.execute(rb1); pl.execute(rb2); pl.execute(rb3); pl.execute(rb4); pl.execute(rb5); shutdown pl.shutdown(); < pre> <p> <strong>Output:</strong> </p> <pre> Initialization time for the task name: task 1 = 06 : 13 : 02 Initialization time for the task name: task 2 = 06 : 13 : 02 Initialization time for the task name: task 3 = 06 : 13 : 02 Time of execution for the task name: task 1 = 06 : 13 : 04 Time of execution for the task name: task 2 = 06 : 13 : 04 Time of execution for the task name: task 3 = 06 : 13 : 04 Time of execution for the task name: task 1 = 06 : 13 : 05 Time of execution for the task name: task 2 = 06 : 13 : 05 Time of execution for the task name: task 3 = 06 : 13 : 05 Time of execution for the task name: task 1 = 06 : 13 : 06 Time of execution for the task name: task 2 = 06 : 13 : 06 Time of execution for the task name: task 3 = 06 : 13 : 06 Time of execution for the task name: task 1 = 06 : 13 : 07 Time of execution for the task name: task 2 = 06 : 13 : 07 Time of execution for the task name: task 3 = 06 : 13 : 07 Time of execution for the task name: task 1 = 06 : 13 : 08 Time of execution for the task name: task 2 = 06 : 13 : 08 Time of execution for the task name: task 3 = 06 : 13 : 08 task 2 is complete. Initialization time for the task name: task 4 = 06 : 13 : 09 task 1 is complete. Initialization time for the task name: task 5 = 06 : 13 : 09 task 3 is complete. Time of execution for the task name: task 4 = 06 : 13 : 10 Time of execution for the task name: task 5 = 06 : 13 : 10 Time of execution for the task name: task 4 = 06 : 13 : 11 Time of execution for the task name: task 5 = 06 : 13 : 11 Time of execution for the task name: task 4 = 06 : 13 : 12 Time of execution for the task name: task 5 = 06 : 13 : 12 Time of execution for the task name: task 4 = 06 : 13 : 13 Time of execution for the task name: task 5 = 06 : 13 : 13 Time of execution for the task name: task 4 = 06 : 13 : 14 Time of execution for the task name: task 5 = 06 : 13 : 14 task 4 is complete. task 5 is complete. </pre> <p> <strong>Explanation:</strong> It is evident by looking at the output of the program that tasks 4 and 5 are executed only when the thread has an idle thread. Until then, the extra tasks are put in the queue.</p> <p>The takeaway from the above example is when one wants to execute 50 tasks but is not willing to create 50 threads. In such a case, one can create a pool of 10 threads. Thus, 10 out of 50 tasks are assigned, and the rest are put in the queue. Whenever any thread out of 10 threads becomes idle, it picks up the 11<sup>th </sup>task. The other pending tasks are treated the same way.</p> <h2>Risks involved in Thread Pools</h2> <p>The following are the risk involved in the thread pools.</p> <p> <strong>Deadlock:</strong> It is a known fact that deadlock can come in any program that involves multithreading, and a thread pool introduces another scenario of deadlock. Consider a scenario where all the threads that are executing are waiting for the results from the threads that are blocked and waiting in the queue because of the non-availability of threads for the execution.</p> <p> <strong>Thread Leakage:</strong> Leakage of threads occurs when a thread is being removed from the pool to execute a task but is not returning to it after the completion of the task. For example, when a thread throws the exception and the pool class is not able to catch this exception, then the thread exits and reduces the thread pool size by 1. If the same thing repeats a number of times, then there are fair chances that the pool will become empty, and hence, there are no threads available in the pool for executing other requests.</p> <p> <strong>Resource Thrashing:</strong> A lot of time is wasted in context switching among threads when the size of the thread pool is very large. Whenever there are more threads than the optimal number may cause the starvation problem, and it leads to resource thrashing.</p> <h2>Points to Remember</h2> <p>Do not queue the tasks that are concurrently waiting for the results obtained from the other tasks. It may lead to a deadlock situation, as explained above.</p> <p>Care must be taken whenever threads are used for the operation that is long-lived. It may result in the waiting of thread forever and will finally lead to the leakage of the resource.</p> <p>In the end, the thread pool has to be ended explicitly. If it does not happen, then the program continues to execute, and it never ends. Invoke the shutdown() method on the thread pool to terminate the executor. Note that if someone tries to send another task to the executor after shutdown, it will throw a RejectedExecutionException.</p> <p>One needs to understand the tasks to effectively tune the thread pool. If the given tasks are contrasting, then one should look for pools for executing different varieties of tasks so that one can properly tune them.</p> <p>To reduce the probability of running JVM out of memory, one can control the maximum threads that can run in JVM. The thread pool cannot create new threads after it has reached the maximum limit.</p> <p>A thread pool can use the same used thread if the thread has finished its execution. Thus, the time and resources used for the creation of a new thread are saved.</p> <h2>Tuning the Thread Pool</h2> <p>The accurate size of a thread pool is decided by the number of available processors and the type of tasks the threads have to execute. If a system has the P processors that have only got the computation type processes, then the maximum size of the thread pool of P or P + 1 achieves the maximum efficiency. However, the tasks may have to wait for I/O, and in such a scenario, one has to take into consideration the ratio of the waiting time (W) and the service time (S) for the request; resulting in the maximum size of the pool P * (1 + W / S) for the maximum efficiency.</p> <h2>Conclusion</h2> <p>A thread pool is a very handy tool for organizing applications, especially on the server-side. Concept-wise, a thread pool is very easy to comprehend. However, one may have to look at a lot of issues when dealing with a thread pool. It is because the thread pool comes with some risks involved it (risks are discussed above).</p> <hr></=>

Förklaring: Det är uppenbart genom att titta på utdata från programmet att uppgifterna 4 och 5 exekveras endast när tråden har en ledig tråd. Tills dess ställs extrauppgifterna i kö.

Uttaget från exemplet ovan är när man vill utföra 50 uppgifter men inte är villig att skapa 50 trådar. I ett sådant fall kan man skapa en pool med 10 trådar. Således tilldelas 10 av 50 uppgifter, och resten ställs i kön. När en tråd av 10 trådar blir tom plockar den upp de 11^thuppgift. De andra pågående uppgifterna behandlas på samma sätt.

Risker involverade i trådpooler

Följande är riskerna i trådpoolerna.

Dödläge: Det är ett känt faktum att dödläge kan komma i alla program som involverar multitrådning, och en trådpool introducerar ett annat scenario med dödläge. Tänk på ett scenario där alla trådar som körs väntar på resultaten från trådarna som är blockerade och väntar i kön på grund av att trådar inte är tillgängliga för körningen.

Trådläckage: Läckage av trådar uppstår när en tråd tas bort från poolen för att utföra en uppgift men inte återvänder till den efter att uppgiften har slutförts. Till exempel, när en tråd kastar undantaget och poolklassen inte kan fånga detta undantag, så avslutas tråden och minskar trådpoolens storlek med 1. Om samma sak upprepas ett antal gånger, så finns det rimliga chanser att poolen kommer att bli tom, och därför finns det inga tillgängliga trådar i poolen för att utföra andra förfrågningar.

Resource Thrashing: Mycket tid slösas bort i sammanhanget att byta mellan trådar när storleken på trådpoolen är mycket stor. Närhelst det finns fler trådar än det optimala antalet kan det orsaka svältproblem, och det leder till resursträsk.

Punkter att komma ihåg

Ställ inte i kö för de uppgifter som samtidigt väntar på resultaten från de andra uppgifterna. Det kan leda till en dödlägessituation, som förklarats ovan.

Försiktighet måste iakttas när trådar används för operationen som är långlivad. Det kan resultera i att tråden väntar för alltid och kommer slutligen att leda till läckage av resursen.

I slutändan måste trådpoolen avslutas explicit. Om det inte händer fortsätter programmet att köras och det tar aldrig slut. Anropa metoden shutdown() på trådpoolen för att avsluta executorn. Observera att om någon försöker skicka en annan uppgift till exekutorn efter avstängning, kommer den att kasta en RejectedExecutionException.

Man måste förstå uppgifterna för att effektivt trimma trådpoolen. Om de givna uppgifterna är kontrasterande, bör man leta efter pooler för att utföra olika sorters uppgifter så att man kan ställa in dem ordentligt.

För att minska sannolikheten för att köra JVM utan minne kan man kontrollera de maximala trådar som kan köras i JVM. Trådpoolen kan inte skapa nya trådar efter att den har nått maxgränsen.

En trådpool kan använda samma använda tråd om tråden har avslutat sin körning. På så sätt sparas tiden och resurserna som används för att skapa en ny tråd.

Trimma trådpoolen

Den exakta storleken på en trådpool avgörs av antalet tillgängliga processorer och typen av uppgifter som trådarna måste utföra. Om ett system har P-processorerna som bara har beräkningstypsprocesserna, så uppnår den maximala storleken på trådpoolen P eller P + 1 maximal effektivitet. Emellertid kan uppgifterna behöva vänta på I/O, och i ett sådant scenario måste man ta hänsyn till förhållandet mellan väntetiden (W) och servicetiden (S) för begäran; vilket resulterar i poolens maximala storlek P * (1 + W / S) för maximal effektivitet.

Slutsats

En trådpool är ett mycket praktiskt verktyg för att organisera applikationer, särskilt på serversidan. Konceptmässigt är en trådpool mycket lätt att förstå. Däremot kan man behöva titta på många problem när man har att göra med en trådpool. Det beror på att trådpoolen kommer med vissa risker (risker diskuteras ovan).